| Scout.com >
Boise State |
 |
2005 WAC Standings: Week 5
Story URL: http://boisestate.scout.com/2/446700.html
|
PerfectBronco
BroncoCountry.com | Oct 2, 2005 |
A look at the standings, both in and out of conference, for all of the WAC Football Teams.
| 2005
WAC STANDINGS |
| Week 1 9-3 |
CONF. |
ALL |
| TEAM |
W |
L |
W |
L |
| San
Jose State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
| Fresno
State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Louisiana
Tech |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Nevada |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Utah
State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Boise
State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Hawaii |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| New
Mexico St |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Idaho |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
| 2005
WAC STANDINGS |
| Week 2 9-10 |
CONF. |
ALL |
| TEAM |
W |
L |
W |
L |
| Fresno
State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
| San
Jose State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Louisiana
Tech |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Nevada |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Utah
State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Boise
State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Hawaii |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Idaho |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| New
Mexico St |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
| 2005
WAC STANDINGS |
| Week 3 9-17 |
CONF. |
ALL |
| TEAM |
W |
L |
W |
L |
| Fresno State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Nevada |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| San Jose State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Utah State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Boise State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Hawaii |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Louisiana Tech |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Idaho |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| New Mexico St |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
| 2005
WAC STANDINGS |
| Week 4 9-24 |
CONF. |
ALL |
| TEAM |
W |
L |
W |
L |
| Hawaii |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| Fresno State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Utah State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Boise State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| Nevada |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| San Jose State |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| Louisiana Tech |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| New Mexico St |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Idaho |
0 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
|
| 2005 WAC
STANDINGS |
| Week 5 10-01 |
CONF. |
ALL |
| TEAM |
W |
L |
W |
L |
| Boise State |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| Louisiana Tech |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| Nevada |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| Fresno State |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
| Hawaii |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Idaho |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
| Utah State |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| San Jose State |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| New Mexico St |
0 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
| Color Key |
| Green |
Teams that control their own
destiny. Teams that if they win the rest of their
conference games will be WAC Champion. |
| Blue |
Teams that have some control of
their own destiny. Teams that if
they win the rest of their conference games would at
least tie for
the WAC championship.
|
| Yellow |
Teams that have lost control of
their own destiny. Teams that if they win the rest of
their conference games would still need help from
other WAC teams to win or tie the WAC
championship. |
| Orange |
Teams with two conference losses,
WAC championship hopes are greatly diminished.
Typically a team with two losses will finish no better
than second place in conference standings. |
| Red |
Teams that are no longer playing
for first place.
Teams that are mathematically eliminated from winning
the WAC championship. |
|
Changes from last year affecting WAC standings and
schedule.
Last year the WAC had 10 teams and an unbalanced
schedule.
Last year each WAC team played 8 of the 9 WAC
opponents.
Last year each WAC team skipped one WAC
opponent.
This year the WAC has 9 teams and a balanced
schedule.
This year each WAC team plays 8 of the 8 WAC
opponents.
This year each WAC team will play all WAC
opponents.
This balanced schedule makes it easier to determine
tie breakers and standings as the season
progresses.
Tie breakers are used for bowl determination.
From the WAC website:
Bowl
placement shall be determined as follows:
1. The top two teams, based upon regular season
finish, shall receive guaranteed bowl berths.
2. If the University of Hawaii is bowl eligible, and
if the WAC has at least three bowl slots, it shall
receive a berth in the Hawaii Bowl, regardless of its
place in the Conference regular season
standings.
3. Once bowl representatives have been determined, a
committee consisting of the Commissioner and Athletics
Directors not involved in the pool of eligible teams,
in consultation with the Conference’s bowl partners,
shall select and place team(s) according to the “right
team, right place” principle. The Committee shall
seek to balance the best interest of the bowls versus
the best interest of the Conference and involved
team(s).
4. Ties in the regular season standings shall be
broken based upon head-to-head regular season
competition.
* Two Tied Teams.
The winner of the regular season game between the tied
teams shall receive the higher place in the
standings.
* Three or More Tied Teams.
Compare the records of the tied teams against each
other. The team(s) with the best record(s) versus the
other tied teams receives the higher place in the
standings. If this results in more than one team
having the best identical record against the other
tied teams, use head-to-head tiebreakers for only
those teams. If the tie still cannot be broken, the
Bowl Placement Committee shall break the tie.
Tie breakers are not used for
determination of the WAC champion.
From the WAC website:
The 2005
WAC football champion will be determined by the
regular season standings in conference games.
Here is this from the WAC code book.
3. Championship Determination
a. Regular Season
The team with the highest won-lost percentage of
Conference games played shall be the regular season
champion.
Two or more teams that are tied with the same
conference record shall be considered
co-champions.
Copyright ©
Scout.com and BroncoCountry.com
|
|